this post was submitted on
164 points (75% like it)
244 up votes 80 down votes
top 200 commentsshow all 208

[–]Kattastrophe 48 points49 points ago

  1. What this subreddit is for needs to be stated more clearly. I've never posted anything here because I'm not sure what would be acceptable. According to the sidebar, I should be able to post a portion of my writing for critique, but the people here don't seem to want that. So, I guess I should post articles about writing. That seems... silly to me. To talk and never do or show. Anyway, the point is, it needs to be made clear what is an acceptable post and what isn't.

  2. The problem with critique posts is that once it's posted, it's out there. It's on the internet for everyone to see. That would need to be made clear. Users should not post anything they intend to publish. If we end up allowing critique, there should be a warning in the sidebar to let everyone know they ought to be careful with what they post. Maybe just put a sample of their work to find their general problem areas.

  3. I don't actually have a four yet. Mostly, we just need to figure out the direction this subreddit is going to take. Then there can be more talk on how to do it and proposals.

[–]lazydictionary 24 points25 points ago

You know what sucks about this subreddit? Here you and many others are actually talking about possible ideas and directions to take the subreddit and no one cares or responds.

We spend more time arguing over the drama (I'm guilty) rather than talk about the direction of the community. Which is exactly what happened when VA was appointed.

I think you have valid points and ideas, and these need to be addressed.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

This is one of the biggest problems. There's no direction in this subreddit.

[–]MaoThatHurt 4 points5 points ago*

Just to flesh out the issue, I subscribed to this and a bunch of related subreddits. Writersgroup, logophilia (definitely on of my favorite subreddits), promptaday, etc. because I wanted to improve my writing. The problem is that I never feel like writing and, beyond nose to the grindstone high quantity output, I don't know how to go about improving.

As for the anger at making violentacrez a mod, I missed all of it but I have a theory. There seem to be a group of redditors who are randomly asked to help mod subreddits, regardless of how much experience they have with the topic. God, that sounds witch-hunty. I guess the point I'm trying to make is that there's a paradox between the actual role of a moderator (mostly just checking the spam filter at regular intervals and working with subscribers to keep the general culture of the subreddit functional) and what we expect from mods, namely a deep level of concern about the direction of the subreddit and knowledge of the topic. Violentacrez mods a lot of subreddits, as do others. When you mod a bunch of subreddits, the value you place on the next one you get is probably a lot lower than one you grew from zero subscribers. So while the real importance of his knowledge of the topic is probably minimal, the perceived importance is quite high. Plus, the more successful the subreddit, the less important their knowledge is because it isn't necessary for them to keep the content and conversation flowing the way it is early on.

[–]Kattastrophe 3 points4 points ago*

Yeah, I read through the thread and mostly just saw posts about VA, which wasn't really what was asked for in this thread. People can complain forever and it won't make a difference. At this point it's time to either abandon ship or get on board and fix it up. People just like to malinger.

And thank you. :)

Edit: Looked up the definition of "malinger" after I wrote it because it suddenly seemed wrong. It isn't quite the word I wanted, but I'm leaving it because it still works-ish.

[–]lazydictionary 8 points9 points ago

We'll just change the definition to "linger in a bad way :)

[–]Kattastrophe 7 points8 points ago

That's what I was going for. And yay for your relevant username. Well done. :D

[–]Chamoflage 2 points3 points ago

What the VA moaning amounts to is a vote of no confidence in IWax. And lots of whining, of course, because this is the internet and what did you expect. But pragmatically speaking, what's being expressed is a lack of trust that IWax will start reliably doing his job after failing to do so for four years and then appointing a pariah to do it for him.

People have been making suggestions and ignored for so long that very few are still willing to give this subreddit the benefit of the doubt.

[–]Kattastrophe 1 point2 points ago

I understand what's happening. I'm just saying that it's either time to try to fix it or leave. There's no reason to keep harping on the same thing over and over.

[–]Sheft 1 point2 points ago

If we end up allowing critique, there should be a warning in the sidebar to let everyone know they ought to be careful with what they post.

Are you seriously suggesting that users on Internet forums read directions / instructions? Of course they don't. Ever.

[–]Kattastrophe 1 point2 points ago

Then that's on them. :P

[–]outsdanding 1 point2 points ago

In my ideal world, the writing subreddit would be more about craft—about the act of writing, rather than the products of that act. Then, there'd be a another one for critique. That way they wouldn't clutter each other up.

[–]Kattastrophe 1 point2 points ago

It's my opinion that those two things go hand in hand. I could be wrong though.

Quick, ninja edit: I feel that talking about writing with one group, then going to another for criticism might be difficult.

[–]expertvoiceEditor - Online Content 0 points1 point ago

The /r/writing guidelines do need to be more clear, and IMHO we do need a separate reddit for critiques (which personally I would ignore) and business-and-craft.

These two things don't go hand-in-hand -- not necessarily. Critique is helpful for writers who are new and trying to get published, but after a certain point many of us don't bother. And most critiques requested seem to be for fiction, which isn't all that relevant to those of us who write nonfiction.

On the other hand, we can all appreciate inspiration. And it's smart to know about business trends and skills (e-book sales up, how to find an agent).

You might see many of the same people in both reddits, but it wouldn't be all of us.

[–]outsdanding 1 point2 points ago

I don't think they're really linked. I'd say something like 20-30% of the posts here are for critique, the others about craft/industry/etc. In my mind they are two entirely different things.

It's probably selfish of me, but I'd love if all the critique requests got filtered out. I spend far too much time reading and critiquing shitty writing at school that it's not something I usually feel like doing (I'm not saying my writing is any better—it's just that I can only take so much). Maybe there could be a weekly digest crossposted of things people are looking to get critiqued.

There's also a big problem with blogspam in this subreddit, which is even more frustrating.

[–]Kattastrophe 2 points3 points ago

You know, you don't have to read the critique posts. It's your choice to click on them.

[–]outsdanding 1 point2 points ago

Oh yeah, I know that. It's not like it's a big deal to me or anything, but if it's a question that's being raised—those are my thoughts on it. (I mean, why even bother having subreddits? If you are looking for something about writing, just don't click on anything else in the one huge master reddit.)

It's also not as though posts requesting criticism are clearly demarcated. People just name the post whatever the title of their piece is pretty frequently. Case in point—based on the post's title I don't know if we're going to be talking about book piracy, plagiarism, violentacrez's penchant for exotic pornography, if it's an original piece of fiction or nonfiction, or what. Then when I get into it I don't know if the guy's sharing something he wrote, looking for a critique, wants it proofread, looking for revision ideas, etc, etc, etc. And it's not like the post I linked to is an outlier. What is this? Or this?

[–]StupidDogCoffee 8 points9 points ago

The way I see it, this community is in need of three positions:

1: Moderator: A person whose job it is to clean out the spam filter, delete unwanted posts and deal with trouble. Typical moderator duties. It should be someone who is on every single day, and has time to go about the mundane tasks of moderating. Should not be a controversial person, but someone levelheaded and good at conflict management, and someone whom the members here would respect.

2: Community Manager: A person whose duty it is to gauge the desires of the community and direct the sub to reflect the community's desires. This person would help establish rules, determine what is in the sidebar, and organize community activity such as contests and so forth. All of these things should be done with an ear to the wants and needs of the community. This person needs to be someone whom the community respects, not necessarily as a great writer, but as someone who is involved in the community. Needs 'people person' skills and the ability to gauge the desires of the sub, as well as the ability and desire to organize events such as writing contests and so forth.

3: Style Director: A person whose job it is to shape the look and feel of the subreddit. Should be familiar with CSS stylesheets to shape the basic look and feel of the reddit, and have an eye for design to implement things like award flair for winners of contests and so forth. This would be a more technical position, and requires less involvement in the community than the others. This position could be filled by an outsider, so long as they enjoyed doing it and were willing to work with the other mods. The position could also be eliminated if either of the other mods had experience with CSS and an eye for design.

With three strong people like this working together, and with the community, I think this sub could truly become something great.

What say you?

[–]agletFreelance Writer 40 points41 points ago

I think the anger at VA being added as a mod arose from the fact that he's not an active member of this sub, and yet was placed in that position over someone who was passionate and driven to make this sub a better place (karlgraves), and even over someone who at least has some celebrity around here (throwaway_writer). ANY mod you placed in that situation would have been up against resistance, and you chose one of the most controversial people you could have in VA on top of that.

This sub has gotten cranky and divisive lately anyway between the self-pub and the traditional pub camps, the inconsistencies over whether links to one's own work is encouraged here or not, general ongoing snootiness... boom, you have a flash mob on your hands.

As for suggestions... I have none. This sub has been struggling for quite a while, and I don't think adding a mod is going to fix it; there are too many different ideas about the direction it should head. Which is fine, because there's enough people subscribed to split into subreddits. And maybe it's time for that.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] 6 points7 points ago

The ordering was entirely incidental and for the most part, meaningless. I had no idea that his name was so controversial, seeing as he is the mod for a lot of subreddits, and he really doesn't do anything controversial in those places. At all.

I do think that what moderation can do is encourage the community to do things -- structure for weekly writing, community events, etc -- and eliminate posts that are popular but mostly pandering filler. People that blogspam or unwanted self-promotion or critique create an annoyance, but they get downvoted by the community and it doesn't take space away from more worthy submissions.

[–]needsmorecoffee 14 points15 points ago

I think the anger at VA being added as a mod arose from the fact that he's not an active member of this sub,

I have to agree with aglet here. This started because people wanted a moderator who was from the active community, and you responded by bringing in another person who wasn't from the active community as moderator. I'm not sure why an angry response would be surprising under the circumstances.

[–]CockCuntPussyPenis 13 points14 points ago

Yep. The creator who is not active at all in the subreddit added a moderator who is not active at all in the subreddit.

[–]agletFreelance Writer 2 points3 points ago

Exactly. And well said.

[–]doublemfunky 0 points1 point ago

CockCuntPussyPenis for mod, that'll look nice on the sidebar.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] -1 points0 points ago

Except I did add someone who was active in the community (karlgraves) -- someone to help with spam and user requests, and someone to steer the community. People threw a shit fit because one's name was ahead of the other, despite the fact that this was completely incidental and I added them within minutes if not seconds of each other.

[–]honestbleeps 11 points12 points ago

I had no idea that his name was so controversial

you've been a redditor for 5 years.

Honestly, I have no dog in this fight, but come on. The above statement either makes you a complete liar or one of the most out of touch redditors on the face of the earth.

I've got no bone to pick with you personally, I just think you should know why people feel the way they do. Nobody in their right mind who reads reddit any more than once a week is going to believe the statement that you had no idea his name was controversial.

[–]ragica 2 points3 points ago

I've got a 5 year badge, and spend way too much time on reddit. I've never noticed or heard of VA before these posts. Maybe I just don't pay attention to the "right" posts?

[–]honestbleeps 9 points10 points ago

Are you also a mod of several / many major subreddits and STILL unaware?

[–]ragica 0 points1 point ago

Well, I do like to think of myself as such. (:

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points ago

I don't think that the anger was directed at you particularly mate. We understand that you may or may not know the history of VA, but to some, including me, to see the man who moderates subs like /beatingwomen and /picsofdeadjailbait moderating a place that I love is disgusting. I (and I'm sure I speak for many here) am not saying that YOU are at fault here. The moderating that you wish to have on this sub is very much welcome, especially since it stands for something that we love not something random.

Unfortunately VA spent his first day as mod here deleting posts and banning people he did not agree with - as he has been known to do in other subs that he manages - and this, even if it had come from some other moderator, is simply unacceptable.

I'm sorry that this has caused you distress in one way or another, but I hope you can see why the members of this community got angry.

[–]MaoThatHurt 2 points3 points ago

I had no idea that his name was so controversial, seeing as he is the mod for a lot of subreddits, and he really doesn't do anything controversial in those places.

Umm, /jailbait? /picsofdeadkids? I don't really care for witch hunts and I missed all this drama but I have a hard time believing you didn't know he was controversial. The dude has systematically trolled just about everyone on reddit with one thing or another at some point. Wait, isn't illuminatedwax the alternate account of Karmanaut or some other big to do in these parts?

[–]illuminatedwax[S] 0 points1 point ago

No, I'm just me and have only ever been me. karmanaut is some other dude.

Also, I realize he is involved in controversy, but the reddits he moderates -- /r/Art, /r/funny, /r/news -- aren't controversial at all. He's a good moderator, he just likes to push the boundaries of the rules in his own subreddits.

[–]TwistTurtle 7 points8 points ago

"What he has, though, is experience moderating several large subreddits, including /r/funny, which, to my knowledge, has not degenerated into a lawless hellhole full of horrible people."

You don't spend that much time in the comments section of /r/funny, do you...

[–]Marty_Stu 15 points16 points ago

I'll throw my cents/hats/pitchforks in here

I've been on /r/writing for a while now, and from what I've seen, the blog/spam clogging up has gone on for time untold.

How did this place get to 30,000 subscribers and not have more than one mod, and why has there never been an FAQ or in-depth guidelines.

I have nothing against you IW, it's just that this place has been crying out for someone to take the reins whose passionate about the community and willing to pitch their time in to help it grow.

/r/write for example has been up a few days and it has an FAQ and guidelines because the people involved want to make it better.

Obviously, this isn't all on you, /r/writing has been around for a while, I'm just not sure why we let it be like this for so long without trying to do anything.

Like those outback towns in the old-west that fail to develop and grow, a kind of e-lawlessness took hold and so far, hasn't been rectified.

[–]karlgrave 15 points16 points ago

I’ll keep this brief, I’ve only got enough in me for one megapost of doom a day.

Governing r/writing

As the admins have made clear, the original mod of subreddits are free to do as they please with them. As such, illuminatedwax is free to govern r/write as he sees fit.

For my part, I think it is safe to say that this situation was not handled in an ideal fashion. But the blame should not be placed squarely on any one party. Problems and conflicts do not arise without there being at least two sides. Perhaps I could have conducted my behavior in a different fashion that would not have led to the current cacophony of complaints.

However, I believe that my conduct (particularly developing www.redditauthors.com) was merely the spark that lit some very dry kindling; the straw that broke the camels back; etc. A large and vocal potion of r/writing wanted something done about the state of the sub - I just happened to be “the right man in the wrong place.”

A Fresh Start

As I think is clear by the 1000+ migration of new subscribers there is a desire to move away from the current situation in r/writing and begin with a clean slate. Between my real life, redditauthors.com, r/write, and WolfPack Publishing - there is no way I could devote time to also being a mod on r/writing as well. So while I appreciate the offer from illuminatedwax, I must respectfully decline.

I absolutely, genuinely wish r/writing all the best and hope that this leads to it being a better sub that gives its users what they want. I believe that illuminatedwax is going to make the effort to do. Give him some time.

For those of you looking for something different, please come visit /r/write - I think you’ll like it there.

Cheers,

karl

[–]thebadguyy 21 points22 points ago

Now, can we talk about writing?

Fucking yes.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

When writers fight and want to make peace what do they bury? A pen?

"Let's just bury the pen and move on" sounds weird... what if it's a pen I really like? Like something with sentimental value? :/

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points ago

It is not like only woodchoppers can reconcile by idiomatically 'burying the hatchet'.

[–]cleti 1 point2 points ago

I also have a pen that I really like and has sentimental value. My roommate gives me so much shit for writing everything in a notebook, and then typing it because "you're giving yourself extra work and adding a pointless extra step". :(

[–]abyssinian 0 points1 point ago

Don't listen to roommates. Do what feels right. I find that I think and write differently on a computer v. with a nice pen on good paper, and both styles have their uses. Plus, when you type it up, you probably do a lot of editing, so really, it's just another draft.

[–]cleti 0 points1 point ago

My point exactly.

[–]lophyte 7 points8 points ago

I'd just like to add that illuminatedwax responded within a couple of hours when I asked him to add the IRC channel to the sidebar, and that was a couple of months ago.

This whole shitstorm seems to have started because he happened to not be responsive in the last week or so.

[–]throwaway_writer 23 points24 points ago*

Cogent and intelligent post, except one thing.

I didn't actually throw a fit. That was a joke. I thought that was obvious by the comment inside, but oh well. I think I'm funny.

EDIT: I can see why IW was a little raw though. People have been shitting wildly on him for this whole debacle.

EDIT 2: With that said, I'd still be glad to mod, if only to be someone visible who can help new authors market their work.

[–]thecajunone 2 points3 points ago

Well this is dumb, I'm think I'm going to unsubscribe now. The whole point of subscribing was getting motivated by fellow writers, not a whole lot of that going around.

[–]deshki 2 points3 points ago

The lack of communication was at fault here. That was your fault.

Lack of patience was another problem. That was our fault. Just make sure this community starts moving in a direction beneficial to writers of all kind, and to not ever leave us hanging.

Nobody knew you were even interested in writing until now, besides the, what, three posts in here?

[–]Psyladine 12 points13 points ago

The craft is the real appeal of this subreddit. Can we have a sidebar of the most commonly cited rules of writing, as r/screenwriting has their dialogue cheatsheat? Twain, Leonard and Vonnegut come to mind.

[–]Naberius0 8 points9 points ago

So, I've been a long time lurker around here. I'd read stuff, occasionally upvote, and bugger off. I don't really have the wherewithall to post a lot of my stuff. I did roll out of bed to see the reactions and overreactions to VA being appointed moderator.

I think that yes the community should have some say in their moderation (/r/lgbt has been going through similar issues lately), but seeing the grounds he's been attacked on? I was never fond of /r/jailbait or anything like that, but I post/read a number of NSFW subreddits, and I did see a few of the attacks based on that alone. I don't know, feels a bit unfriendly to me at this point. So, my first post, and perhaps my last, but figured I'd throw in my two cents.

[–]fegh00t 5 points6 points ago

Many people, especially those behind a veil of anonymity, are quick to argue ad hominem, which is, of course, ludicrous, and not relevant the least bit to the matters at hand.

[–]MCoorlimSelf-Published Author 5 points6 points ago

You WOULD say that.

[–]Kaladin_StormblessedAuthor - Genre Fiction 9 points10 points ago

Thank you for stepping in and clearing these things up. I have to wonder if this isn't too little, too late, however.

From what I've been seeing, it looks like the biggest complaints are the sidebar, lack of FAQ and submission guidelines (tags). Any ideas on how you'll be addressing the concerns of the community on these matters?

[–]MassawyrmCareer Writer 13 points14 points ago

Honestly I would like to see the end of self-promotion and critique posts on this subreddit. There are a number of GREAT critique subreddits, but because people innately want the most exposure, they choose the largest subreddit (where they are bound to be downvoted into oblivion) rather than the smaller subreddit that will embrace and properly critique their work. Likewise, I think most people want to see the end of "Hey my book is free on Kindle for the next two days, please download it!" posts.

Ultimately I feel that r/writing will be far better served by a community talking about writing and publishing rather than being drowned in posts asking to be read. I don't believe that the reddit needs to be subdivided any more than that.

[–]Psyladine 12 points13 points ago

The real divide in r/writing now is whether its a vehicle for developing or promoting works.

[–]cozz 0 points1 point ago

my thoughts exactly.

[–]HeroicGomez 0 points1 point ago

Agree. If they want to go to r/write then let them, but if the community's going to fragment, then let's just do away with those posts entirely. They don't positively add to the community and are entirely self-serving.

[–]felatiodeltoro 2 points3 points ago

I'm a writer. I literally subscribed to this subreddit yesterday. I have no input as to what needs to be done to this, or any other, subreddit. I just cane here because I thought it would be nice to involve myself with other redditors who write for a living. I have been shown otherwise. i'll be back in a few weeks.

[–][deleted] 67 points68 points ago*

As It happened, he did ban, delete posts, and then unban and undelete posts.

What also happened was a fucking witch hunt.

It's not a 'witch hunt' to be upset that you appointed the moderator and creator of r/picsofdeadjailbait, r/rape, r/beatingwomen and r/picsofdead kids to be in charge of our community. It is absolutely warranted that we are protective of this place, because we like it, and you are MIA, so there is noone else to protect it.

'm very passionate about both, and I hope to find the time to be a writer in the near future. I have a lot of friends who are aspiring authors. This is why I started /r/writing.

Actually you are on the record as stating that you went around creating as may subreddits as possible when the system rolled out specifically to 'subreddit squat' on them.


As Karlgraves, the guy who we wanted to be moderator, has said in another place:

Given that I-wax apparently has no intention of relinquishing control of r/writing (despite having no desire to interact with it), it is clear I will never be able to fully control r/writing. Ultimately, this is unacceptable for me. As can be seen by VA’s “Animal Farm” appointment as mod, there will always be a pallor of a threat or removal of control hanging over r/writing.

So any future mods be clear on this, you're not going to be in control of the subreddit. Illumwax can and might delete you at any time for any reason, until he steps down as a mod.


This whole thread is bullshit and does way too little, way too late. All I can do is urge r/writing to continue to migrate over to r/write. r/write is already better organized than r/writing ever was, and gained 1000 members from this crap yesterday alone. I suppose that's all we can thank illuminatedwax and violentacrez for.

[–]Socialery 32 points33 points ago

also lead moderator of /r/help and other such reddits, but ignore that.

[–]lazydictionary 30 points31 points ago

List of mainstream reddits he helps moderate

2012Olympics
404
Abortion
Alternative_Music
Angel
Bad_Cop_No_Donut
beasts
Big_Oil
BigPharma
Bullshit
BugWars
cancer
censored
Charleston
ClipArt
Cool
CopyRight
CorporateWelfare
creepy
Crime
Dallas
DallasMeetups
DangerMouse
Darkfall
Diabetes
DrugWarNews
entertainment
Fibromyalgia
FineArt
Fortean
FoundArt
funny
Gaza
GlobalWarming
GradSchool
HealthCare
Hell
HelloKitty
Homophobia
IDF
ILiveIn
IMDB_Comments
Islamophobia
korea
LGBTNews
macabre
men
Misc
needadvice
news
NopeNopeNope
obscure
occult
Odd
Olympics2012
PBWorks
PoliceState
Plutocracy
Questions
revenge
RichPeople
Rights
ScaredShitless
SexCrimes
ShoePorn
Skulls
SurfShop
Syria
Talk
TheGreatSatan
Thumbs
Twidder
Uncensored
vintage
Voters_Rights
wallpaper
Web_Games
WebGames
WestBank
wiki
Womens_Rights
Workers_Rights
worldofgoo
WTF

[–]lazydictionary 18 points19 points ago

Moderating reddits:

BadModerators
funnymods
help
helpme
helpmods
mickeymouse
ModClub
ModDrama
Moderating
Moderation
ModGuides
modhelp
modreview
modsmack
modtest
NotForTesting
PoliticalModeration
_moderating

[–]wanderederer1 14 points15 points ago

TIL Violentacrez works for the FBI.

[–]tomstockmail 22 points23 points ago

Just one more to add because of what it is:

/r/Admin, where he moderates second to hueypriest, a reddit admin.

[–]MCoorlimSelf-Published Author 1 point2 points ago

So what you're saying is that the guy is obviously too damn busy to give this sub the attention it needs.

Got it. Thanks.

[–]lazydictionary 32 points33 points ago

He is shady, yes. But he also moderates some of the largest Reddit communities, and does a good job of it.

Everyone dislikes him for the subreddits you mentioned, but that shouldn't change your opinion of his moderator abilities. This is /r/writing , not /r/jailbait. He would moderate this subreddit like every other mainstream popular reddit.

[–][deleted] 22 points23 points ago

He was a mod for one day and was already deleting posts and banning users who disagreed with him.

[–]lazydictionary 33 points34 points ago

He banned a throwaway, and then immediately unbanned it. Not a big deal. It didn't help that as soon as he was appointed, everyone caused a giant shit storm over nothing.

Doesn't matter now anyway, Illuminated Wax caved into peer pressure.

Hope /r/writing understands that reddits are not democracies, they are autocracies. We'll see where this all goes.

[–]mushpuppy 0 points1 point ago

I think this whole issue needs to be dropped. It's evident a new sub about writing has been created. People who want to sub to it can. People who want to sub to both can.

Enough already.

[–]ICumWhenIKillMen -4 points-3 points ago

But he also moderates some of the largest Reddit communities, and does a good job of it.

http://imgur.com/a/UdZ37

Truly fantastic moderation!

[–]Skylighter 11 points12 points ago

This split is just a thinly veiled power grab over a dinky subreddit. This place doesn't have the numbers to split, and doing so will only lead to the death of both. IW has pretty much demonstrated his willingness to cooperate and compromise with us by removing VA and addressing us, but that's just not enough, is it? You want all or nothing, right?

So go ahead and martyr over the whole thing. Fight over this tiny corner of the Internet. I guess whoever has the highest subscriber count at the end of the month wins, but we all lose by propping up some artificial dividing line.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] 31 points32 points ago

so there is noone else to protect it.

Protect it? Protect it from what? Was VA going to start posting pictures of dead baby rape all of a sudden? He successfully moderates a lot of subreddits. I understand if seeing his name or seeing him in a position of power makes people uncomfortable. That's why he was removed. But to act as though his modding somehow endangered /r/writing is completely ridiculous.

I did not start /r/writing to "squat." The subreddits I started are, with a couple exceptions*, subreddits whose topics are near and dear to my heard and that I wanted to see exist on reddit. I understand that my position as "first to the punch" is unique, and I respect this -- that's why my moderation style is (or started out) so low key on larger subreddits. I felt I didn't have the authority to make major changes to communities.

However, I do think I am very good at picking people who represent the will of the community.

* The exceptions are /r/conspiracy and /r/911truth. I made those subreddits to move them out of the main reddit, where they constantly caused controversy and name-calling and so on.

So any future mods be clear on this, you're not going to be in control of the subreddit. Illumwax can and might delete you at any time for any reason

I have never, ever deleted a moderator 'just because.' I think my record is exemplary as far as "deleting people cuz i'm mad" goes. The only reason I've ever removed a moderator is because there was community outcry against them.

I'm seeing myself painted some kind of power hungry crazy man that will delete moderators at any time with no notice. Really, the whole point of why I enjoy moderation is because the community has a tendency to become unhinged. (Exhibit A ) The kind of frothing madness that promotes witch hunts has no place in moderation, and god help us if someone like that becomes a moderator of a larger subreddit.

[–]MacBooey 2 points3 points ago

Thank you. I am unsubcribing from this BS place called /r/writing and going to /r/write

[–]exatorp 3 points4 points ago

TIL: reddit is actually not much better than 4chan

r/picsofdeadjailbait? What. The. Fuck.

[–]BetaMemeTester 7 points8 points ago

Not a fair assessment. Reddit is better because it allows 4chan behavior to be equally accessible as r/fundamentalchristianbullshit. As has been said a million times, this place is what you make of it. Some people like weird, offensive, awful, horrific, stuff. Some people do not. So take part in the subbreddits you are interested in.

[–]exatorp -4 points-3 points ago

Perhaps reddit allows it and it's constrained to a small audience in a subreddit, instead of it appearing on a main board as on 4chan, but I don't see it as vastly different.

Fucked if I'll ever fund that shit with a gold subscription though.

[–]ICumWhenIKillMen -2 points-1 points ago

Not a fair assessment.

Yeah, 4chan actually bans people for posting preteens and jailbait.

[–]_Goose_ 0 points1 point ago

You say that like reddit wouldn't ban anyone who posts illegal material of children?

[–]ICumWhenIKillMen -1 points0 points ago

4chan bans for any pictures of preteens and jailbait. Reddit does not.

[–]betterth 3 points4 points ago

Split the community. If you think you've got a /r/marijuana /r/trees issue on your hands, if you think you can make tomorrow's best new community out of this, do it.

Something tells me that a wonderful new community will not be born of out this retarded self-aggrandizing witch-hunt bullshit.

But hey, the freedom to try is there.

[–]triestoohard 1 point2 points ago

The dude's not even a mod of r/write

[–]bekelevenAuthor - Genre Fiction 4 points5 points ago

He doesn't moderate /r/beatingwomen.

[–]HaloShy 18 points19 points ago

You haven't read enough. A few corrections:

So that's all that happened. violentacrez never banned anyone from /r/writing. The ban list is completely empty.

Yes he did. He then removed the ban. He said so himself. His reasons for banning were personal attacks, and he then reconsidered because he wanted to let people vent or something along those lines.

Not to mention that just about no one noticed that I added karlgraves.

Lots of people did. Many were happy about that. Unfortunately, the other mod you promoted made a big post first and then caused a shitstorm by banning someone. Admittedly, I think the shitstorm would have happened for other reasons that it eventually got to, but that initial meeting certainly served as a catalyst.

I love books (I mod /r/books) and I love writing. I'm very passionate about both, and I hope to find the time to be a writer in the near future. I have a lot of friends who are aspiring authors.

Can you please explain why you've only ever submitted twice to this subreddit in all four of the years since you created it, despite what I'm quoting above? If you have lots of deleted submissions, now would be a good time to clear the air.

A mod is someone that deals with the day-to-day trivialities of a subreddit: fishing spam out of the spam filter. Removing blogspam or offtopic posts. Helping other subcommunities (see sidebar --->) be seen. Helping people do things like writing contests or promote third party sites that mesh with /r/writing.

Again, can you explain why you haven't responded to the numerous requests to do exactly what you just said? The community does not have access to people's accounts, but many have come forward and said they have sent you private messages asking you to provide links, etc, and you ignored all of them. Like the previous comment, now would be a time to clear the air.

What a mod is not is the best writer. A mod is not the person with the most knowledge about writing. A mod is not the person who has the most works published.

Agreed. The mod, however, should be a writer. The lead moderator should be invested in the community and be knowledgeable about it. I would agree that a non-interested moderator could be an asset further down the line for the sole purpose of clearing out spam, but that's another discussion.

I can see that a lot of people say they want more out of this community than just a plain old mod, but so far I've only seen vague notions of how to improve this reddit,

Again, you haven't read enough then. There are many posts regarding what changes the community would like to see. A lot of explanations about the differences between r/writing and r/write were outlined in all of the posts that you deleted and apparently didn't read. I can provide links to where they are compiled elsewhere, but I think you want posts here now so people can upvote/downvote. To be perfectly honest I'm wary of going through all the trouble of finding all the links for you since I'm half expecting you to delete my comment after seeing wipe almost a dozen threads clear off the front page an hour ago.

Also, throwaway_writer, I'd be glad to consider, but despite not even having messaged me or #writing in the last couple weeks, he threw a fit about VA being made mod over him.

Again, you didn't read enough. He even said in his own post that he doesn't want the job. He was making a point that even he would be a better mod choice since he's actually a writer and has firsthand knowledge of the topic of this subreddit.

Now, onto a more general comment. This post is pretty good and positive, but it's about 48 hours too late. I repeated the term "clear the air" at least twice; you should have done this before taking action. Put yourself in the shoes of those who spoke up about the lack of moderation here--you're not seen to be posting, you're not replying to private messages, and then you promote some guy outside of the community without any warning, prompts, or response. How would you have reacted to an outsider showing up out of the blue with that role, regardless of their shady site history?

You also really need to address one of my first questions above. Where have you been? If you agree that a moderator should do all of those above things and you're passionate about the subreddit's topic, why have you posted so little? Don't you agree that it might be better to promote a handful of mods, give them some time to settle in and make sure none of them are mod abusing power trippers, and then step down?

[–]Skylighter 5 points6 points ago

This whole idea of wanting our moderators to be a writer is ridiculous. We need a good mod, regardless of his hobbies. There have been plenty of Presidents that have served as Commander in Chief without actually joining the military. Good mods are good mods, regardless. And needing to be a writer to become a mod is limiting and close-minded.

[–]MCoorlimSelf-Published Author 3 points4 points ago

You can't give people what they need if you don't understand what they need.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] -2 points-1 points ago

Yes he did. He then removed the ban. He said so himself. His reasons for banning were personal attacks, and he then reconsidered because he wanted to let people vent or something along those lines.

Looking at the moderator activity log, this ban lasted for less than an hour.

Can you please explain why you've only ever submitted twice to this subreddit in all four of the years since you created it, despite what I'm quoting above? If you have lots of deleted submissions, now would be a good time to clear the air.

Because I don't submit to reddit a lot, period. If you want an example of my activity, look at my comment history, and look at the sidebar.

You also really need to address one of my first questions above. Where have you been?

Before last week, patiently answering user requests and pulling stories out of the spam filter. My moderation policy is generally laissez-faire. It's clear the community wants something more than that now, and that's why I'm adding more mods. This last week, I've been knee-deep in programming and off in Ohio.

I'm not saying that moderators have to be the most active people in a subreddit. I'm not even sure what kind of structure /r/writing should have outside of simple laissez-faire moderation. In fact, I don't think that's for me to decide, that's for the community to decide. Hence this post.

[–]HaloShy 0 points1 point ago

Looking at the moderator activity log, this ban lasted for less than an hour.

violentacrez never banned anyone from /r/writing. The ban list is completely empty.

?

Because I don't submit to reddit a lot, period. If you want an example of my activity, look at my comment history, and look at the sidebar.

I've been through your entire history already. I did it the night your lack of moderating was brought to see for myself exactly how active or inactive you are. You are plenty active enough on other parts of the site, especially in terms of comments. Hell, you're so active that the kind people over at redditrequest refused to make a new mod of this subreddit based on that very activity.

I'm not saying that moderators have to be the most active people in a subreddit. I'm not even sure what kind of structure /r/writing should have outside of simple laissez-faire moderation. In fact, I don't think that's for me to decide, that's for the community to decide. Hence this post.

So why have you ignored so many requests for changes, sidebar additions, etc? Please do not dodge this question. It's very important. I can see the rationale in the less-is-more approach, I really can. In some subreddits it can work quite well. I don't see any logic behind straight up ignoring the community that is trying to contact you.

Right now many people are viewing this as a "oh shit, I got called out on not doing anything in a subreddit I grabbed the name of way early without having the slightest interest in any of it, I better show my face for a bit until it calms down." If you are honestly, genuinely not doing that, you need to take these sorts of questions seriously, address them, and explain yourself.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] 3 points4 points ago

Because I've been swamped this last week. That's at the very beginning of my list. All of this stuff regarding sidebars and FAQs and so forth has been in the last week or so, and I've been too busy to address it. I realize this is a problem, and so to help deal with it, I modded someone who both volunteered and has a proven track record with modding -- violentacrez.

I see sidebar requests in modmail that I hadn't gotten to in the last 3 days. But other than that, it's mostly "Exemption requests" (which I don't give) and people asking to get stuff pulled out of the spam filter. No one has sent me any mod mail regarding a FAQ. People are happy to rack up karma posting comments bitching, but very rarely do they bother telling me personally. No one can see every comment posted or every self post in /r/writing. And yes, this community needs more moderation, but I'm willing to defend my 4 years as a whole, not just recent history.

I haven't had as much time as I usually do for reddit recently. This is a temporary situation as I'm working late hours, long commutes, moving, etc., lots of personal shit. This is going to go away, and then I will be back doing what I've done for a long time. And people that are very active on the site now might go away entirely in 6 months.

[–]HaloShy 4 points5 points ago

Because I've been swamped this last week. That's at the very beginning of my list. All of this stuff regarding sidebars and FAQs and so forth has been in the last week or so, and I've been too busy to address it. I realize this is a problem, and so to help deal with it, I modded someone who both volunteered and has a proven track record with modding -- violentacrez.

Did you not even read what I wrote to you? Or the threads that were created about this? Nearly a dozen examples came out of the community about times that you didn't respond to a private message. You've been swamped this last week? What about the last four years?

I see sidebar requests in modmail that I hadn't gotten to in the last 3 days. But other than that, it's mostly "Exemption requests" (which I don't give) and people asking to get stuff pulled out of the spam filter. No one has sent me any mod mail regarding a FAQ. People are happy to rack up karma posting comments bitching, but very rarely do they bother telling me personally. No one can see every comment posted or every self post in /r/writing. And yes, this community needs more moderation, but I'm willing to defend my 4 years as a whole, not just recent history.

Ah, more info there. I apologise. So it's your word against theirs, but I've already pointed out at least four cases in this exchange of posts that you've been flat out wrong, not reading enough, or passing a half truth. See what I mean about communication?

I haven't had as much time as I usually do for reddit recently. This is a temporary situation as I'm working late hours, long commutes, moving, etc., lots of personal shit. This is going to go away, and then I will be back doing what I've done for a long time. And people that are very active on the site now might go away entirely in 6 months.

If that's the case and, given your history of activity in this subreddit, are you opposed to simply handling over the community to a few mods and letting the solution form internally? This post you've made is the first communication you've initiated in almost three years.

[–]DallasTruther -4 points-3 points ago*

Someone's calling their buddies to downvote you.

*Of course those same guys are upvoting him. His "arguments" wouldn't make most users who actually know how to read sympathetic to him.

[–]HaloShy -1 points0 points ago

The whole thing is just funny now. Ah well.

[–]BusangodGrateist Righter Evah 6 points7 points ago

wait, but what am i supposed to do with all these pitchforks?

thanks for the post. Now let's do all write good with each other!

[–]miparasito 2 points3 points ago

I have one question and even though it's moot now, I hope someone can answer -- is ViolentAcrez the same person as the lady who runs the blog Violent Acres? Because even though that VA's hobby is stirring up drama on the internet, you have to count the blog as significant writing experience. Love or hate her opinions, she's a damned good writer.

[–]violentacrez 2 points3 points ago

[–]miparasito 2 points3 points ago

Ah! Thank you. Sorry about that!

[–]violentacrez 1 point2 points ago

No worries, common mistake, that's why I created that page.

[–]TheRaven7 1 point2 points ago

including /r/funny, which, to my knowledge, has not degenerated into a lawless hellhole full of horrible people

ಠ_ಠ

[–]miss_contrary_girl 5 points6 points ago

It's a really big subreddit, for writers, and it makes sense to that it should have more than one moderator, and that at least one, if not all of them, be active writers. Why not just make karl_graves a moderator and work with him directly instead of requiring a proposal? I'm not convinced he'll be the best ever, but he's motivated, and it'll be the best thing to get r/writing re-integrated.

ps. I appreciate knowing the violentacrez wasn't an FU, because I found that more offensive than slacking in moderator duties. I have no beef against that guy, but just the idea that you might have meant it that way. So thanks for the clarification.

[–]tomstockmail 8 points9 points ago

Why should a moderator be an active community member? Active community members make friends, enemies, and other biases. Giving someone like that power will lead to members being outcasted. From what I saw, VA doesn't post here in /r/writing but at least lurked since he reached out to help. He was a neutral party to this subreddit, but his reputation caused everyone here to freak the fuck out.

I barely post in the communities I moderate and I like it that way. I also think mods shouldn't be able to upvote/downvote in their communities, for comments and links, and usually would like the community to remove mods but this whole clusterfuck makes me rethink that decision, since clearly the community does not know what's best for the community.

[–]SurferGurl 3 points4 points ago*

there's some things that really suck about this whole situation. first of all, people are being downvoted for expressing their opinions about this when there really shouldn't be any up or down votes. ALL voices in this debate need to be heard, no matter what is being said.

we can go on and on for days and weeks about ViolentAcrez' character and we won't get anywhere. basic fact: lots of people on reddit, not just in the r/writing sub, don't like him. message to ViolentAcrez: you can't go around whining that people don't like you when you've chosen to be a controversial high-profile reddit user -- and seem quite proud of your rep.

because of that, when illuminatedwax didn't communicate with the subscribers about anything, just appointed ViolentAcrez and Karlgraves as co-mods. in the time it took to ping these two people and ask them to be mods, illuminatedwax could have informed some or all of the community about his plans -- he could have run this idea up the flagpole, so to speak. that would have avoided lots of grief.

illuminatedwax claims he didn't know ViolentAcrez was so controversial. i don't buy that for a second. if you're on reddit, even occasionally, you just can't go around claiming you live under a rock.

yet, even if we go with illuminatedwax's fantasy that he innocently appointed an active, talented moderator as a "fixer," it doesn't change the fact that ViolentAcrez came into the community like he was a badass gunslinger sent in "to clean up this here town" and banned a subscriber right away was even more heavy handed. (who cares if he unbanned him right away? it was a cheesy thing to do.) add to that the fact that now, 12 hours or so later, the situation has devolved into illuminatedwax and ViolentAcrez and their posse of thugs engaging in a flame war with people who care a shit ton more for the community than they ever will.

at any point in this cluster fuck, illuminatedwax could have chosen to be humble and gracious and cooperative, and collaborated with the top contributors to fix problems that were, really, in the grand scheme of things, just minor issues.

and to think, after all this, illuminatedwax and ViolentAcrez are STILL making excuses, blaming others, and allowing the shit storm to continue to stink up this joint.

doesn't sound at all like good moderating to me. actually, it seems that any claims the mods make about how much they care about reddit and this community is total bullshit at this point, considering all the bad choices they keep making.

it should not matter which subscribers post in this community or how often they post. almost every single redditor was a lurker at one time, and some redditors continue to lurk in some communities and seldom if ever post, yet post actively in other communities. mods, however, really should be active in their communities and not just fixers. if fixer mods are needed, then there should be a designated, roving crew -- users known for their ability to remain as neutral as possible while fixing things that are actually broken. just sayin...

[–]Deimorz 5 points6 points ago

violentacrez never banned anyone from /r/writing. The ban list is completely empty.

Check the moderation log, not the ban list.

[–]TH3RM4L-WorkAuthor - Non-Fiction 4 points5 points ago

I love both r/writing and r/write, let's just pick a mod and talk about writing.

I mod r/leangains and r/fitmeals if you would like help. I try to do my best at leaving the community to it's own and stepping in when I see it is needed.

Of course checking the Filters are always needed.

[–]lngwstksgk 1 point2 points ago

First thing I think needs to be established is what, exactly this subreddit is for. I agree with what you say in the post about it being for the craft of writing, but lately that seems to be the minority opinion. I very much like karlgrave's idea (I think it was him, anyway) about a weekly brag thread and think it would go a long way toward controlling the "free book" thing. I'm not at all sure how to handle critiques, though, in this setting without some people taking bad advantage. Moving to a different subreddit isn't a solution, either, as evidenced by r/writersgroup.

Second thing is defining spam. To me, posting every thought in blog form is spam and posting your "free today only" book is also spam. Same with "10 tip" lists. What do others think?

[–]capgras_delusionEditor 3 points4 points ago

Regarding book promotions...

Why don't we stick a googledoc with a calendar into the sidebar? If people wanted to promote their book, they could put the dates of the promotion into the calendar. People who are inclined to look at, download, and review free ebooks would have a resource to get a whole mess of books, while people who aren't interested don't have to click. Since it's already published, there's no critique needed and reviews can go on Amazon or whatever.

I don't think book promotion should be banned entirely, but I don't think that every keyboard shitsession uploaded to Amazon should be submitted as its own topic, either.

[–]Kaladin_StormblessedAuthor - Genre Fiction 1 point2 points ago

Here's where we discussed it.

So far, the first such thread on /r/write seems to be doing pretty well, so this might be something that could be implemented here as well to the community's benefit.

[–]AlloftheEverythings 2 points3 points ago

Thanks for clearing that up. I was new to the community and confused by all of this. Reading the comments in reply to this post... hilarious and depressing. Seems that the "bad" will always outweigh the "good" and people will keep mouth breathing their ignorant outrage all over the subreddit.

I'll check back with /r/writing when people stop getting their stupid juice all over the rug.

[–]JennysDad 5 points6 points ago

Thank you for listening to the community.

[–]lazydictionary -2 points-1 points ago

So you approve of the witch hunt?

[–]violentacrez 16 points17 points ago

Well, to be fair, Jenny does have a nice ass. ;)

[–]lazydictionary 3 points4 points ago

Oh god why did you post here....bracing for the storm...

[–]zegotaPublished Author - Genre Fiction 2 points3 points ago

For the record, violentacrez did absolutely ban. He reversed the ban after we complained, which is why the banlist is empty.

[–]monkihed 1 point2 points ago

Bye, /r/writing.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points ago

Now, can we talk about writing?

People are, in /r/write.

[–]Sheft 1 point2 points ago

I have a suggestion for choosing extra moderators. All the vocal parties in this bitchfest of the past week should be excluded from the list of potentials. Say what you want about the lack of moderation recently, but putting any of these shit-stirrers (stirred for our own good, of course) in a position of authority here would be a big mistake.

[–]xsidekick409 0 points1 point ago

Good management is about good communication. You did not in any way communicate to the community what you were doing when you added va and now you are trying to cover up your tracks. The lack of communication is unacceptable and for that reason alone you are still at fault for this entire situation. Do not blame people who frequent this sub for speculating and coming to conclusions with the information at hand. That's what a community does. You do not posses the qualities of a leader and should still yield your ownership of this sub to someone who does.

[–]illuminatedwax[S] 4 points5 points ago

now you are trying to cover up your tracks.

The fuck? I'm being very explicit about what I did and why I did it.

[–]deadliestsnatch11 1 point2 points ago

Deleting posts is the opposite of being explicit.

[–]xsidekick409 -3 points-2 points ago

You needed to be explicit BEFORE you did it, not AFTER. You also needed to be involved weeks or months ago when people were asking for change.

[–]lophyte 3 points4 points ago

I imagine that, considering va mods a bunch of legit and non-creepy subs without issue, illuminatedwax had no way of telling that the community would blow up at him for adding va as a mod.

I don't believe anyone was calling for change or spearheading any protests months ago. This issue seriously seems to have arisen simply because illuminatedwax didn't respond to some attempts to contact him in the last week.

Seriously, give the guy a break.

[–]lngwstksgk 1 point2 points ago

It blew up because the drunken publshedwriter posted about promotional posts getting downvoted. That seems to have lit the kindling on fire, the kindling being the lack of response adding redditauthors to the sidebar. Internet time appears to make people think everything should happen instantaneously.

[–]lophyte 0 points1 point ago

Thanks for the clarification. I didn't see the publishedwriter post.

[–]lngwstksgk 0 points1 point ago

It was "publsihedwriter," actually, or something like that. He was self-admittedly too drunk to spell.

[–]capgras_delusionEditor 1 point2 points ago

Here are my previously-posted ideas:

Regarding book promotions//free books

Regarding the sidebar and a FAQ

Ideally I'd like to see sort of outline people can look at before they post, kind of like AskReddit. If you're completely new to writing, check out this link, if you want to promote your book, go here, if you want a critique, well, sorry, I don't have any ideas for that yet. I know it won't completely get rid of repeat posts and spam, but the community would at least have a resource to point to before downvoting something into oblivion.

[–]RattusRattus -1 points0 points ago

Someone suggested we take away the downvote buttons, I'd like to second that. Also perhaps a general FAQ and new writers FAQ, which should consist solely of that Ira Glass quote.

I also think random pieces offered for critique can generate interesting conversations as much as random blog postings. Just spend some time with it before posting it and be clear about what you want. Tags are good a good suggestion.

[–]Fudgefactor7Self-Published Author 0 points1 point ago

Honestly, I do not care one iota who is mod as long as (a) they do the job, (b) they do it well, (c) they aren't abusing power, and (d) are available for future snafus that might appear. I don't care about an individual's sexual predilections (or lack thereof), I just want a better, more vibrant community. If VA can do the job, cool; if not, then he shouldn't be considered. What I would want is a meritocracy, really, and nothing more.

[–]renieriAgent - Children's Non-Fiction -1 points0 points ago

Y U NO maintain consistent moderation?

[–]ObsidianSentinel 0 points1 point ago

I'm fairly new to Reddit, but I'll volunteer as a Moderator if one is needed. I'm an English Major and only have class twice a week, so Moderating wouldn't be a problem for me. Anyways, just a suggestion.

[–]Deimorz 2 points3 points ago

So let's choose some people to help moderate.

Well, it doesn't qualify as a "person", but if you want some help keeping the spam-filter clear and such, I created a moderation bot recently that's being used successfully in quite a few subreddits now.

You can set it up to do simple things like "if a self-post gets filtered and the author of it has at least 10 comment karma, approve it". Conditions like that seem to almost always work well, self-posts are rarely used for spam, and spammers won't have even that small amount of karma.

[–]StarbucksCoffee -2 points-1 points ago

Well done, you are one of the best mods on reddit.

My request is to add more mods in /r/books and /r/writing to help clear the spam filter more faster.

[–]renieriAgent - Children's Non-Fiction -1 points0 points ago

[–]songcharts -4 points-3 points ago

If you want to be taken seriously as a moderator you should probably refrain from deleting posts and censoring whatever you want.

[–]violentacrez 0 points1 point ago

Funny, the mods of /r/askscience were nominated for Best Moderator of 2011 for doing exactly that.

[–]songcharts 0 points1 point ago

I don't care about r/askscience. All this bullshit in r/writing could have been avoided if illuminatedwax had allowed other redditors from r/writing instead of outsiders like you to moderate the subreddit (which I point out he still has not done).

If he's going through so much shit and work in his personal life why does he still think he can moderate all by himself (something he doesn't do on the other subreddits he's a moderator of)?

[–]remedialrob -2 points-1 points ago

I'd never run into a post by the head man before. Seems like a reasonable dude. I approve and support his administration.

[–]HITLARIOUS -3 points-2 points ago

[–]sje46 -4 points-3 points ago

A big problem with VA isn't really that he's a moderator of less than respectable subreddits, but that he causes a lot of drama naturally. Not just by virtue of him creating these subreddits, but the ways he moderates them. I'm pretty sure that the first time /r/jailbait was banned had something to do with him immaturely making people mods who posted CP and shit because he was annoyed at the admins or some bullshit like that.

[–]RattusRattus 3 points4 points ago

Can we stop with hearsay? It was also widely reported that illuminatedwax didn't respond to pms about this subreddit, which isn't true.