Epistaxis

- friends
41,157 link karma
124,924 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 5 points6 points ago

Sometimes it's worth saying "wrong" to show your disagreement with someone even if you don't take time to argue with them.

Actually that's arguably bad reddiquette: "Please don't ... Make comments that lack content." I don't think it's worth saying "wrong" without saying why.

If you think I "look wrong" just because I don't want to argue with you

I don't want to argue with you either; I was just hoping you would say what you mean because I'm interested in the topic. You've taken more time not doing that than it would have taken to do that.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 6 points7 points ago

You know this is totally unpersuasive and just makes you look wrong, right? And I say this without even really knowing what your point was supposed to be.

Salon: "TED is a massive, money-soaked orgy of self-congratulatory futurism" by boop-boop-a-doopin technology

[–]Epistaxis 1 point2 points ago

Lighten up, folks. He's not really saying the talks are bad.

Why TED Is a Massive, Money-Soaked Orgy of Self- Congratulatory Futurism - It has become an exclusive, expensive elite networking experience. Strip away the hype and you're left with a reasonably good video podcast with delusions of grandeur. by JackIsidorein TrueReddit

[–]Epistaxis 51 points52 points ago

I always assumed the ban on editorialized titles was about submitters who add their personal opinions; everything in this title appears verbatim in the article.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis -2 points-1 points ago

Virtually no one currently in the armed forces was drafted. No one who joined since 2001 was choosing between serving and fleeing the country.

Do you disagree that mature, serious adults can have reservations about praising people for that choice, or are we just playing semantics?

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 5 points6 points ago

So do you want to specify what claim you were disagreeing with, and then give us a hint as to what historical evidence refutes it?

Salon: "TED is a massive, money-soaked orgy of self-congratulatory futurism" by boop-boop-a-doopin technology

[–]Epistaxis 7 points8 points ago

Science Channel? Is that the one with the aliens or the one with the ghosts?

Did he deserve it, really? by himmmmmin WTF

[–]Epistaxis 0 points1 point ago

"just watering my dog"

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 1 point2 points ago

You used the word "pussy" and called the pacifists just about everything else in that vein, but fine, I have amended my comment just to avoid ambiguity.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 6 points7 points ago

Sure, but if I only have one jerky package to send, I at least want a utilitarian quantifier.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 1 point2 points ago

Yeah, that's the only reason they could have possibly signed up. Not because their older brother was killed on 9/11, or in subsequent battles with the Taliban. Or because they have family or friends there already and wanted to go help keep them alive. Or maybe just because they wanted to do what they could to keep any soldier alive that they could. It's all really so simple for you, isn't it? So black and white.

No, and I'm pretty sure I explained that.

And how about you grow the fuck up and stop insulting people because they chose a path you disagree with.

It seems like you've confused me with one of the people whose right of conscience I'm defending. No, I'm not personally saying it's bad to send goodies to the soldiers (though I'd rather send them to the displaced civilians). I'm saying you're a jackass for insulting people as "pussies" "young", "entitled", "naive", "myopic", "fucking disgusting", "spoiled", and "selfish" just because they're more strongly opposed to wanton destruction than you or me.

EDIT: selected more appropriate words

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 7 points8 points ago

Do you want to give us a hint as to which war wasn't fought primarily by the poor of the countries involved?

Blizzard: Diablo 3 account compromises historically in line with WoW expansions by mehgandavidin gamernews

[–]Epistaxis 0 points1 point ago

Actually it reads like "compromises" is a verb, and that does get awfully confusing since there's no other verb here. It's traditional to omit forms of "to be" in headlines, but that makes for a lot of crash blossoms.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis -1 points0 points ago

I'm not sure why that matters in this case though.

Because anyone who's in the armed forces now joined when the public was already well aware of what was going on in these wars.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 0 points1 point ago

They had the balls to put everything on the line to defend our freedoms from fascists.

So we should worship the military, right or wrong, because... we hate fascism?

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 0 points1 point ago

Because it's an all-volunteer army and people hate the wars? I don't know how you get to the conspiracy theory from there, but I hope it's clear why supporting the troops isn't a given.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 0 points1 point ago

Yeah, it's such an extreme reversal; in those days, hippies spit on soldiers for not fleeing the country to avoid serving in an unjust war, and today it's always "Support the troops!" for people who knew exactly what they were getting into.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis 2 points3 points ago

You can send a book to a soldier and still be against the war.

Just like you can be a mature, serious adult and not praise that soldier for volunteering for that war.

Yesterday's admin support the troops blog post is about to go into the negatives. Bonus: Erik Martin responds to propaganda conspiracy theorists. by anony666in SubredditDrama

[–]Epistaxis -2 points-1 points ago

Comments like this remind me of just how self-absorbed, tribal, and dangerous nationalism is.

As you say, the U.S. armed forces are made up of volunteers. The country has been at war for over a decade now, so basically anyone who's on active duty now volunteered while these wars were already on. So there are people who knowingly signed up to be transported across the world and go kill people for no good reason.

To kill people. To fucking kill people. This isn't a ping-pong tournament with questionable corporate sponsors, it's the death and displacement of thousands, or millions, of human beings. Fuck you very much for putting your politics and imaginary scenarios and anachronistic machismo above that many lives.

Are redditors young and entitled? I'm sure they are. Are they "pussies"? Yeah, definitely that too. And I can tell not because they're too cowardly to go participate in unjust wars, as you suggest, but because they're too cowardly to take any non-internet action against the broken democracy that starts those wars. But that doesn't necessarily mean they're wrong for not jumping on the bandwagon of glorifying the military, a very disturbing proposition if you look at any sort of historical context.

And it certainly doesn't mean the soldiers are right, either. Of course most of them probably joined without full knowledge of what they were getting into, and perhaps because they had financial hardships and families to support. I certainly wouldn't disagree that they're brave and probably well-intentioned, and I wouldn't personally spit on anyone in uniform as we used to do during the last stupid long-term war (when they were drafted!), before this alarming trend of army-worship. But don't you dare call people brats just because they don't want to give a reacharound to someone whose job is to kill people.

tl;dr No, you grow the fuck up, and stop insulting people just because they're opposed to needless killing.

view more: next