Lungs

- friends
58 link karma
132 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE


  • Verified Email

    Five-Year Club

Why does Reddit hate Nickelback? by mcd_sweet_teain Music

[–]Lungs -2 points-1 points ago

I think there music is awful because they have not adapted to the intense hatred of hipsters and come out with something decent and/or worthy of critical acclaim.

Why does Reddit hate Nickelback? by mcd_sweet_teain Music

[–]Lungs -1 points0 points ago

Hate is as much a relationship as love and its already been said in these comments that hatred for Nickelback is fairly universal wherever elitism's concerned. So, it's complicated, but you can be sure it means something.

Pascal's Wager vs. Homer Simpson by bergencoin atheism

[–]Lungs 1 point2 points ago

Beautiful verses from the Simpsonian Book of Duff.

You have the means to create your own country, how would you run it? by [deleted]in AskReddit

[–]Lungs 3 points4 points ago

I had to find this post too, then I saw your post, and well! I have to ruin something.

I want this future. Now. by datasource1337in videos

[–]Lungs 2 points3 points ago

I already feel sorry for the developers who will have to program such comprehensive software for the glass.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

Point taken! Nothing was observed, rather than nothing was real.

As sentient life, we have come a long way in tracing our roots to the big bang. Still, it was a long, long time before life could imbue an organism with a sensory reality.

This is leaving the logic of the arguments above in the dust as suddenly a plethora of possibilities become apparent in how sentience could proliferated this universe, and how reality for one species could be vastly different to our own given to the hard nature of its existence being, presumably, unlike the conditions we have on earth.

Anyway, I suppose this brings us to how humans are individually separate, in some sense, by their perception of what is real and what is not.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

Fascinating! I'm not sure. The environment is not real, ie. does not form at a sensory intersection, if the observer does not exist. It is not clear whether an organism is real if it can not sense itself, but surely (to be an observer) it must sense itself within its environment?

Worth the Read by hinduguruin trees

[–]Lungs 0 points1 point ago

I thought trees was a celebration of cannabis culture.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

It's called word salad and it's not intentional.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

If reality forms in the intersection of an organism and an environment then different sense-perceptions mean that there are different realities because different realities form in different organism/environment 'sensory' intersections!

So, that is how I could answer the question, though not empirically because we lack the technology to see what we would term: sensory intersections! :D

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

Are there different realities?

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 2 points3 points ago

Art, on the other hand, has a logic of its own.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 1 point2 points ago*

Thank you! The thought dis/order aspect is by far the most interesting aspect of temporarily and permanently altered states.

Why is it so difficult to discuss psychotropic phenomena? by Lungsin philosophy

[–]Lungs[S] 1 point2 points ago

How many realities are there? I've always been interested in a schizophrenic's sense-perception because it diverges from an ordinary reality.

Memetic Engineering - Phishing for Nmemes by Lungsin memetics

[–]Lungs[S] 0 points1 point ago

Very true! Thanks for being so clear on the subject.

I think I am beginning to see memetic engineering, though I am not entirely sure. A lot has changed since I was last interested in memetics, rather: there's a lot more to be interested in.

why does most of reddit basically denounce objectivism as bullshit? by effjaydubin Objectivism

[–]Lungs 0 points1 point ago

The hardest thing about objectivism is its subjective reality. It's easy to imagine a way out of any moral thought experience, though that does not negate an objective reality. No matter what you might do, there's always something you have done and will do.

You've made it clear you are not objectivist by demonstrating the decisions you make are determined by your experience and nothing else. In the real world, chances are you find objectivists to be difficult because they're adhering to decisions which seem predetermined; metaphysical anomalies are irrelevant to the objectivist paradigm.

Basically, the objective/subjective split is revealed in the 'moral' moment. You are about to kill an animal to eat, it is intelligent, understands its fate, possibly even related to you, you are a lion.

A human has choice, and this fact obscures an objective reality.

why does most of reddit basically denounce objectivism as bullshit? by effjaydubin Objectivism

[–]Lungs 2 points3 points ago

I think you have proved your point.

I can't stop watching this. by Kaahnein videos

[–]Lungs 0 points1 point ago

Fuck Simon, I like you more than frogs, etc.

By "I can't stop watching this", I was expecting a short, loopable video, not a video I couldn't close.

Easily the most amazing thing I've ever seen... by blahsapin books

[–]Lungs 0 points1 point ago

Umberto Eco in a vending machine? What else?

view more: next